May 25, 2007

Scary Seeds [shaina]

Genetically Modified Organisms - It seems like these new seeds have been mostly ignored. After watching an eye-opening documentary on them I've realized how dangerous the times we live in are, in a very intimate way. Our very food is corrupted on a cellular level. Junk food isn't limited to aisles of sugary temptations anymore, one item at a time, one new chemical on the fields at a time, one new genetically altered food staple at a time.

Food which grows from these compromised seeds are steadily stocking our grocery shelves. For an "unknown" reason we are not being made aware of the potential hazards that these new foods are presenting to our health and to the economy of the nation. Heck the packages aren't even labeled. Monsanto, the leader of GMO patents, claims that they have no responsibility to test and prove the health of their foods for human consumption, the government is responsible for this. So is the claim.

However, the government doesn't seem to be catching up on this either. Depending on the food experiment with GMO's people have had adverse physical reactions AFTER products hit the shelves. With no long term testing, what will happen with these mutated seeds over the course of introducing them into our environments? Perhaps this explains our recent tragic loss of honeybees?

What is the purpose of a GMO? From what I gather there are 2 reasons. Money and well money. The history is basic, farmers were enjoying the freedom that chemicals were offering their fields. However, after dealing with the bugs there was still another problem with production: weeds are a profit buster too, so instead of digging up their weeds with their own bare hands, luckily there was a company who could help. Monsanto helped the farmer by supplying him with incredible sprays, but they were too powerful for plants to survive, but this was no longer a problem, with the help of E. Coli and Salmonella, Monsanto could break down the cell wall and introduce Round Up (a popular and powerful herbicide) resilient genes to the interior of the cell walls of the broken down seed. Thus a "Round Up Ready" seed-- the height of creation!

Now there were less bugs on crops, but more birth defects, cancer, and gas masks, but let's not go there.

Sure it sounds like a conspiracy theory, yet how is it that some cereals have more sugar than ice cream? Who is responsible for educating Americans about eating healthy? Parents? Kraft? The State? Food Network? Doctors? What if I told you that YOU are responsible for your food choices and that those choices are going to have an incredible effect on your life, and the lives of your loved ones? It gets a bit scary. It gets scarier if you realize that the food "friends" are really food foes and that all that education has deep pockets behind it.

The main four: corn, soybeans, wheat, and cotton are mostly GMO crops.

Europe will not allow GMO food to be sold without it being clearly labeled. Mexico rejects GMO corn into it's own farms for fear of losing the many heirloom varieties that are an essential part of their culture. And we have them freely with no limits.

So I've remembered why I love organic food so much. Now if only I could get organic faith. . .

5 comments:

  1. ugh... i hate how so much questioning and thinking has to go into so many things... i just want to pick up an apple and eat it, not worry about if there is some substance from mars in it.

    most of the time i would rather choose ignorance [is that a virtue?]

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have to admit that my first reaction was quite a bit like Justin's. "Are you serious? ANOTHER thing to worry about?"

    But it got me started thinking about the whole question of who should be in charge of ensuring that our food is healthy. I think that in some part, you are right that we have the ultimate responsibility in determining what is going into our bodies. However, in order to really understand what food does to your body (other than observing your own reactions), you need the help of some scientists who know what they are doing and who can take on case studies and control groups to study GMOs (or whatever) for long periods of time. I don't know whose responsibility to pin this on (the FDA?), but I definitely know that individual persons cannot produce such studies.

    Furthermore, if no research has been done, you end up reading material that is extremely biased. So for example, maybe an organic farmer is losing a lot of money because other farmers can produce GMO crops. So the organic people lash out and try to discredit their crops (notice that the motivation is still for money). I'm not saying that that is what you are doing, Shaina, I'm just saying that without any scientific support it's just their word against the other.

    One last thing: I think that it's important to remember that correlation does not equal causation. We can take a look at the population of the U.S. and say "oh look, there are more birth defects and cancer now, and oh look, now we have GMOs" but that does not mean that they are causing one another. To determine this you might need to look at birth defects and cancer on a more global scale. Does the same hold true in Mexico where there are no GMOs?

    I think that the best point that you made here is that some countries are outlawing them. That raises a big red flag... but again, are they outlawing them because of health or because of money?

    Just some thoughts... I still love organic food and always will.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't know the first thing about GMOs, but seriously... the very idea of anything's being "genetically modified" seems a bit scary to me.

    My own philosophy about food is mainly "Try to eat balanced meals as much as possible, and don't stress about the rest ..." but if I read "GMO" on a label, it would probably turn me away for the most part. Also, I think I have chocolate in the wrong place on the food pyramid :-P

    ReplyDelete
  4. I realize that I'm beginning to sound like I long for caveman (and woman) days, but our society's avoidance of anything natural is frightening. As I watch cancer slowly rob my father of his life (most likely caused by Diet Pepsi), I realize that it these are moral problems that should be tackled by individuals, groups, churches, grassroots organizations and government. Why? Because, surprise, surprise, the invisible hand that supposedly guides democracy is not there, and where there is a way to make a dollar, our businesses will do it, even if it means killing their buyers (unless you believe the comical arguments from Thank-you For Smoking).

    Nature is good. God said so somewhere a very long time ago... Maybe we should start taking that to heart.

    ReplyDelete
  5. (oops, i meant capitalism, not democracy... hopefully those aren't the same things...)

    ReplyDelete